August 15, 2011 4:27 pm ET
Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) owes his fame in large part to his prominent statements about the federal government intruding on states' rights, but he supports imposing his repressive right-wing ideas on abortion and sexuality upon the whole nation through constitutional amendments. According to Perry, safety net spending and the direct election of U.S. senators are also on the wrong side of the Constitution.
Perry Uses The 10th Amendment To Argue Against Health Care Reform, Environmental Regulations, And National Education Standards. In a March 9, 2011, speech, Rick Perry said: "Two years ago, we also joined together, we raised our voices against Washington's continuing encroachment into matters best left to Texas. Since that time things have gone from bad to worse. Washington seizing control, or attempting to seize control, of our air permitting process, reinterpreting the Clean Air Act in a way that it was never intended to be, and in the guise of health care reform, imposing mandates on our citizens that clearly overstepped federal bounds. They've even attempted to bribe us with our own money. We've been resisting the lure of taking federal dollars that would've forced us to blindly accept national education standards, tied our hands in the way that we administer unemployment benefits. Our founding fathers very clearly spelled out exactly the powers that were enumerated to the federal government and explicitly left the rest to the states. Over the years and decades, Washington has extended its reach bit by bit until the sound concepts behind the 10th amendment were blurred and lost, and the idea of states' rights treated almost as a punchline." [Gov. Perry Speech, 3/9/11, via YouTube]
Perry: Texas Law Criminalizing Sodomy "Is Appropriate." From the Associated Press: "The Texas law that bans homosexual sex is 'appropriate,' Gov. Rick Perry said Tuesday, a day after the U.S. Supreme Court said it would decide a Texas case that asks whether it's unconstitutional for states to punish same-sex couples for having sex. 'I think our law is appropriate that we have on the books,' Perry said. The case the court will review is the prosecution of two Houston men under a 28-year-old Texas law that makes it a crime to engage in same-sex intercourse." [Associated Press, 12/4/02, via Amarillo Globe-News]
Perry Supports Constitutional Amendment Prohibiting States From Legalizing Gay Marriage. As reported by ABC News: "Texas Governor Rick Perry told the Associated Press today that he does support a constitutional amendment to define marriage as between one man and one woman, stripping states of the power to decide who can get married. 'Yes, sir I would. I am for the federal marriage amendment,' Perry told the Associated Press in a phone interview. 'And that's about as sharp a point as I could put on it.'" [ABC News, 7/30/11]
Perry Supports A Constitutional Amendment Banning Abortion. In an email to the Houston Chronicle, Perry spokeswoman Katherine Cesinger wrote: "Gov. Perry is proudly pro-life and successfully championed strong pro-life legislation in Texas including parental consent, this year's sonogram bill and a budget that significantly defunds abortions in Texas. The governor has long supported overturning Roe v. Wade, and would support amending the U.S. Constitution, with the backing of Congress and the states, to protect innocent life." [Houston Chronicle, 7/29/11, emphasis added]
Perry: "Social Security Is A Ponzi Scheme" That "Even Makes Mr. Ponzi Feel Bad." From the November 21, 2011, edition of Fox News Sunday:
GOV. RICK PERRY (R-TX): What I'm saying is that between Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare there's $106 trillion of unfunded liabilities, and not one dime saved to pay for them. My children who are in their 20s know that Social Security is a Ponzi scheme. [...] Well it, it probably is a, is a program that even makes Mr. Ponzi feel bad if he were still alive. The fact is, our children know that the money that they're putting into Medicaid they'll never see. And they need to fix it, and it is a Ponzi scheme. I don't know how you'd explain it any other way than what, what you just did. There are fewer people paying into it, and our kids are never gonna see any benefit from it. Fix it, and fix it today. [Fox News Sunday, 11/21/11, via Political Correction]
Perry: General Welfare Clause Of Constitution Doesn't Justify Medicare, But "I Don't Know If I'm Going To Sit Here And Parse...What The Founding Fathers Thought General Welfare Meant." In an interview with Newsweek, Rick Perry had the following exchange with reporter Andrew Romano:
[NEWSWEEK:] The Constitution says that "the Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes... to provide for the... general Welfare of the United States." But I noticed that when you quoted this section on page 116, you left "general welfare" out and put an ellipsis in its place. Progressives would say that "general welfare" includes things like Social Security or Medicare-that it gives the government the flexibility to tackle more than just the basic responsibilities laid out explicitly in our founding document. What does "general welfare" mean to you?
[PERRY:] I don't think our founding fathers when they were putting the term "general welfare" in there were thinking about a federally operated program of pensions nor a federally operated program of health care. What they clearly said was that those were issues that the states need to address. Not the federal government. I stand very clear on that. From my perspective, the states could substantially better operate those programs if that's what those states decided to do.
[NEWSWEEK:] So in your view those things fall outside of general welfare. But what falls inside of it? What did the Founders mean by "general welfare"?
[PERRY:] I don't know if I'm going to sit here and parse down to what the Founding Fathers thought general welfare meant.
[NEWSWEEK:] But you just said what you thought they didn't mean by general welfare. So isn't it fair to ask what they did mean? It's in the Constitution.
[NEWSWEEK:] OK. Moving on. [Newsweek, 8/12/11, emphasis original, via Daily Beast]
Perry Favors Repealing Federal Government's Constitutional Authority To Levy Income Tax. From Fed Up! by Rick Perry: "[W]e should restrict the unlimited source of revenue that the federal government has used to grow beyond its constitutionally prescribed powers. One option would be to totally scrap the current tax code in favor of a flat tax, and thereby make taxation much simpler, easier to follow, and harder to manipulate. Another option would be to repeal the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution (providing the power for the income tax) altogether, and then pursue an alternative model of taxation such as a national sales tax or the Fair Tax." [Fed Up!, p. 126, emphasis added]
In His Book, Perry Writes Disapprovingly Of The 17th Amendment Providing For The Direct Election Of U.S. Senators. From Fed Up! by Rick Perry: "But the Progressives were not finished. They dealt another blow to the ability of states to exert influence on the federal government with the passage and ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment. That amendment established the direct election of senators, replacing the constitutionally prescribed system of state legislatures choosing them." [Fed Up!, p. 36]
Copyright © 2010 Media Matters Action Network. All rights reserved.