Health Care Summit: GOP Away Team Has Made Numerous Irresponsible Decisions Regarding America's Health
By Ignoring The Facts, GOP Summit Attendees Turned Their Backs On Their Home States
The Center for American Progress has done what the GOP Away Team has failed to do: investigate just how badly their states need Democratic health care reform.
Nationally
- Health reform could lead to the creation of up to 4 million jobs over the next ten years.
- In 39 states, two health care carriers control at least half of the health insurance market.
- The average family premium cost $1,100 more in 2009 because our system fails to cover everyone.
- The U.S. economy lost up to $248 billion in productivity in 2009 because of the size of our uninsured population.
Arizona
Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ)
Sen. John McCain
(R-AZ)
- In Arizona, health reform could lead to the creation of up to 7,100 jobs over 10 years.
- In Arizona, the top 2 insurers control 65% of the market.
- The average family premium in Arizona cost $1,700 more in 2009 because our system does not cover everyone (that's well above the national average of $1,100).
- The Arizona economy lost up to $6.2 billion in productivity in 2009 because of the size of our uninsured population.
Iowa
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA)
- In Iowa, health reform could create up to 3,800 jobs over the next ten years.
- In Iowa, the top 2 insurers control 80% of the market.
- The average family premium in Iowa cost $600 more in 2009 because our system does not cover everyone.
- The Iowa economy lost up to $1.5 billion in productivity in 2009 because of the size of our uninsured population.
Illinois
Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL)
- In Illinois, health reform could lead to the creation of up to 17,700 jobs over 10 years.
- In Illinois, the top 2 insurers control 69% of the market.
- The average family premium in Illinois cost $1,200 more in 2009 because our system does not cover everyone (that's well above the national average of $1,100).
- The Illinois economy lost up to $9.3 billion in productivity in 2009 because of the size of our uninsured population.
Kentucky
Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
- In Kentucky, health reform could lead to the creation of up to 3,500 jobs over 10 years.
- In Kentucky, the top 2 insurers control 69% of the market.
- The average family premium in Kentucky cost $1,100 more in 2009 because our system does not cover everyone.
- The Kentucky economy lost up to $3.2 billion in productivity in 2009 because of the size of our uninsured population.
Louisiana
Rep. Charles Boustany (R-LA)
- In Louisiana, health reform could lead to the creation of up to 3,200 jobs over 10 years.
- In Louisiana, the top 2 insurers control 74% of the market.
- The average family premium in Louisiana cost $900 more in 2009 because our system does not cover everyone.
- The Louisiana economy lost up to $4 billion in productivity in 2009 because of the size of our uninsured population.
Michigan
Rep. Dave Camp (R-MI)
- In Michigan, health reform could lead to the creation of up to 6,100 jobs over 10 years.
- In Michigan, the top 2 insurers control 73% of the market.
- The average family premium in Michigan cost $900 more in 2009 because our system does not cover everyone.
- The Michigan economy lost up to $6.5 billion in productivity in 2009 because of the size of our uninsured population.
Minnesota
Rep. John Kline (R-MN)
- In Minnesota, health reform could lead to the creation of up to 4,800 jobs over the next 10 years.
- In Minnesota, the top 2 insurers control 76% of the market.
- The average family premium in Minnesota cost $400 more in 2009 because our system does not cover everyone.
- The Minnesota economy lost up to $2.6 billion in productivity in 2009 because of the size of our uninsured population.
Ohio
Rep. John Boehner (R-OH)
- In Ohio, health reform could lead to the creation of up to 7,400 jobs over the next 10 years.
- In Ohio, the top 2 insurers control 58% of the market.
- The average family premium in Ohio cost $1,000 more in 2009 because our system does not cover everyone.
- The Ohio economy lost up to $7.1 billion in productivity in 2009 because of the size of our uninsured population.
Oklahoma
Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK)
- In Oklahoma, health reform could lead to the creation of up to 2,900 jobs over the next 10 years.
- In Oklahoma, the top 2 insurers control 71% of the market.
- The average family premium in Oklahoma cost $1,900 more in 2009 because our system does not cover everyone (that's well above the national average of $1,100).
- The Oklahoma economy lost up to $3.4 billion in productivity in 2009 because of the size of our uninsured population.
Tennessee
Sen. Lamar Alexander
(R-TN)
Rep. Marsha Blackburn
(R-TN)
- In Tennessee, health reform could lead to the creation of up to 5,100 jobs over the next 10 years.
- In Tennessee, the top 2 insurers control 62% of the market.
- The average family premium in Tennessee cost $900 more in 2009 because our system does not cover everyone.
- The Tennessee economy lost up to $4.3 billion in productivity in 2009 because of the size of our uninsured population.
Texas
Rep. Joe Barton
(R-TX)
Rep. John Carter
(R-TX)
- In Texas, health reform could lead to the creation of up to 34,000 jobs over the next 10 years.
- In Texas, the top 2 insurers control 59% of the market.
- The average family premium in Texas cost $1,800 more in 2009 because our system does not cover everyone (that's well above the national average of $1,100).
- The Texas economy lost up to $30 billion in productivity in 2009 because of the size of our uninsured population.
Virginia
Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA)
- In Virginia, health reform could lead to the creation of up to 11,900 jobs over the next 10 years.
- In Virginia, the top 2 insurers control 61% of the market.
- The average family premium in Virginia cost $1,000 more in 2009 because our system does not cover everyone.
- The Virginia economy lost up to $5.5 billion in productivity in 2009 because of the size of our uninsured population.
Wisconsin
Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI)
- In Wisconsin, health reform could lead to the creation of up to 7,100 jobs over 10 years.
- In Wisconsin, the top 2 insurers control 62% of the market.
- The average family premium in Wisconsin cost $900 more in 2009 because our system does not cover everyone.
- The Wisconsin economy lost up to $3 billion in productivity in 2009 because of the size of our uninsured population.
Wyoming
Sen. John Barrasso
(R-WY)
Sen. Mike Enzi (R-WY)
- In Wyoming, health reform could lead to the creation of up to 890 jobs over the next 10 years.
- In Wyoming, the top 2 insurers control 85% of the market.
- The average family premium in Wyoming cost $1,300 more in 2009 because our system does not cover everyone (that's well above the national average of $1,100).
- The Wyoming economy lost up to $430 million in productivity in 2009 because of the size of our uninsured population.
Rep. Paul Ryan's "Roadmap" Recycles The Failed Policies Of Bush & McCain And Stand To Hurt America's Seniors
Privatizing Social Security
|
Rep. Paul Ryan |
Sen. John McCain |
President George W. Bush |
|
Rep. Ryan's Budget Privatizes Social Security. According to the Congressional Budget Office's analysis of Rep. Paul Ryan's "Roadmap for America's Future" budget proposal: "A system of individual accounts would be established in 2012. In that year, workers who are age 55 or younger would be able to participate in voluntary individual accounts, funded with a portion of their payroll taxes. As necessary, the government would make payments to account holders during their retirement to guarantee that their contributions earned a rate of return at least equal to the rate of inflation." [Congressional Budget Office, 1/27/10] |
McCain Supported Privatizing Social Security. According to his campaign website, "John McCain supports supplementing the current Social Security system with personal accounts." [McCain Campaign Website, accessed 3/28/08] |
Bush Supported Privatizing Social Security. While speaking to the American Legislative Exchange Council, President Bush said, "I strongly believe that younger workers ought to be allowed to take some of their own money and put it in a personal savings account, so they can watch their money grow at a rate greater than that which the Government can grow their money, a personal account they call their own, a personal account the Government cannot spend, a personal account they can pass on to whomever they want." [Speech to the American Legislative Exchange Council, 8/3/05; Public Papers of the Presidents] |
Cutting Social Security Benefits
|
Rep. Paul Ryan |
Sen. John McCain |
President George W. Bush |
|
Rep. Ryan's Budget Cuts Social Security Benefits. According to the Congressional Budget Office's analysis of Rep. Paul Ryan's "Roadmap for America's Future" budget proposal: "Traditional retirement benefits would be reduced below those scheduled under current law for many workers who are age 55 or younger in 2011. People with lower earnings would experience smaller reductions in benefits, and those with higher earnings would experience larger reductions. Current beneficiaries and workers who are age 55 or older in 2010 would experience no change in benefits." [Congressional Budget Office, 1/27/10] |
McCain's Campaign Called For Cuts In Social Security Benefits. The Nation reported: "McCain's economic aide, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, poured a little more oil on the fire by explaining that Social Security benefits must be cut to keep the system solvent. 'You can't keep promises made to retirees,' Holz-Eakin said." [The Nation, 3/4/08] |
Raising Medicare Premiums
|
Rep. Paul Ryan |
Sen. John McCain |
President George W. Bush |
|
Rep. Ryan's Budget Raises Medicare Premiums & Cuts Benefits. According to the Congressional Budget Office's analysis of Rep. Paul Ryan's "Roadmap for America's Future" budget proposal: "People who are age 65 or older in 2020 and other existing enrollees at that time would continue to be covered by the current program, although some higher-income enrollees would pay higher premiums, and some program payments would be reduced." [Congressional Budget Office, 1/27/10] |
McCain Favored Raising Medicare Premiums. As reported by the Washington Post, "married retirees who make more than $160,000 a year would pay increasingly higher costs for the newly established Medicare prescription drug plans... They said the specifics of who would pay more, and how much, would be worked out later. 'You could make this as aggressive as you want to get more savings,' said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, McCain's top policy adviser." [Washington Post, 4/15/08] |
Raising Age Of Medicare Eligibility
|
Rep. Paul Ryan |
Sen. John McCain |
President George W. Bush |
|
Rep. Ryan's Budget Raises Eligibility Age For Medicare. According to the Congressional Budget Office's analysis of Rep. Paul Ryan's "Roadmap for America's Future" budget proposal: "The age of eligibility for Medicare would increase incrementally from 65 (for people born before 1956), as it is under current law, to 69 years and 6 months for people born in 2022 and later." [Congressional Budget Office, 1/27/10] |
McCain Voted To Raise The Medicare Eligibility Age From 65 to 67. In 1997, McCain voted in favor of raising the eligibility age for receiving Medicare from 65 to 67 with the change being phased in between 2003 and 2027. The motion passed 62-38. [S 947, Vote #112, 6/24/97]
McCain Supported Increasing The Medicare Eligibility Age. In 1997, McCain voted for an increase in the eligibility age of Medicare, creating a home health co-payment, and means testing Medicare part B. McCain voted to drive healthy people from the Medicare system. The motion failed 25-75. [S 947, Vote #115, 6/25/97] |
Privatizing Medicare
|
Rep. Paul Ryan |
Sen. John McCain |
President George W. Bush |
|
Rep. Ryan's Budget Privatizes Medicare. According to the Congressional Budget Office's analysis of Rep. Paul Ryan's "Roadmap for America's Future" budget proposal: "Starting in 2021, new enrollees would no longer receive coverage through the current program but, instead, would be given a voucher with which to purchase private health insurance.
|
Bush Favored Privatizing Medicare. According to the American Prospect, "Bush's idea of privatizing Medicare has long been promoted by conservative congressmen and the insurance industry. Seniors would be given a flat voucher, which they could spend either on traditional Medicare or on private Medicare policies run by managed-care companies. The government's contribution to the voucher would be capped, so that seniors who wanted decent coverage would have to dip into their own resources. There are multiple problems with this approach. For one thing, it has been tried and found wanting. Under a waiver provision of the current Medicare program, health insurers already can compete with conventional Medicare by taking your Medicare premium and in exchange offering more generous benefits than standard Medicare provides." [American Prospect, 9/10/00] |
Taxing Health Insurance & Offering Inadequate Tax Credits
|
Rep. Paul Ryan |
Sen. John McCain |
President George W. Bush |
|
Rep. Ryan's Budget Taxes Health Insurance Benefits & Offers Inadequate Tax Credits. According to the Congressional Budget Office's analysis of Rep. Paul Ryan's "Roadmap for America's Future" budget proposal: "In 2011, the current tax exclusion for employment-based health insurance would be replaced by a refundable tax credit for the purchase of health insurance, either through an employer or on an individual basis. The tax credit initially would be set at $2,300 per adult and $1,700 per child, not to exceed $5,700 per tax-filing unit." [Congressional Budget Office, 1/27/10]
|
McCain Proposed Taxing Health Insurance Benefits & Offering Inadequate Tax Credits. While describing the health care plan proposed by John McCain, the Washington Post wrote, "McCain's prescription would seek to lure workers away from their company health plans with a $5,000 family tax credit and a promise that, left to their own devices, they would be able to find cheaper insurance that is more tailored to their health-care needs and not tied to a particular job. Under McCain's plan, $3.6 trillion worth of tax breaks over a decade that would have gone to businesses for coverage of their employees would be redirected to individuals, regardless of whether they are covered by a company plan. [Washington Post, 4/30/08]
|
President Bush Proposed Taxing Health Insurance Benefits & Offering Inadequate Tax Credits. According to the New York Times, "Mr. McCain's health care plan would shift the emphasis from insurance provided by employers to insurance bought by individuals, to foster competition and drive down prices. To do so he is calling for eliminating the tax breaks that currently encourage employers to provide health insurance for their workers, and replacing them with $5,000 tax credits for families to buy their own insurance. His proposal to move away from employer-based coverage was similar to one that President Bush pushed for last year, to little effect. And his call for expanding coverage through market-based competition is in stark contrast to the Democrats' proposals to move toward universal health care coverage, with government subsidies to help lower-income people afford their premiums." [New York Times, 4/30/08] |
GOP Summit Attendees Have Made Numerous Irresponsible Decisions Regarding America's Seniors
While Democratic health care reform proposals bolster Medicare by virtually eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse, Republicans rely on a false line of attack, insisting legislation would lead to benefit cuts.
Despite their hollow rhetoric, Republicans have a long track record of philosophically opposing Medicare and actively seeking to reduce its funding.
The GOP's shocking hypocrisy is laid out below: since 1991, Senate Republicans have voted to slash $1.31 trillion from Medicare while their Republican counterparts in the House voted to take over $1 trillion away from America's seniors.
House Republicans Have Voted To Cut Over $1 TRILLION From Medicare Since 1991
Republican Senators Have Voted To Cut $1.31 Trillion From Medicare













